Monographie
The demand for responsiveness in past U.S. military operations / Stacie L. Pettyjohn
Type de contenu
- Texte
Type de médiation
- sans médiation
Type de support
- Volume
Titre(s)
- The demand for responsiveness in past U.S. military operations / Stacie L. Pettyjohn
Auteur(s)
Autre(s) responsabilité(s)
Publication
- Santa Monica (Calif.) : RAND corporation
Date de copyright
- C 2021
Description matérielle
- 1 vol. (XI-75 p.) : ill., graph., tabl. ; 28 cm
Collection
- [Research report] RR-4280-AF
ISBN
- 978-1-977406-57-6
- 1-977406-57-2
EAN
- 9781977406576 br.
Appartient à la collection
- Research report RR-4280-AF
Classification décimale Dewey
- 355.033 273
Note(s)
- La p. de titre porte en plus : "Prepared for the Department of the Air Force, Approved for public release, distribution unlimited"
Note sur les bibliographies et les index
- Bibliogr. p. 68-75. Notes bibliogr. Chronol.
Note sur le contenu
- Chapter One: The Link Between Responsiveness and Readiness Chapter Two: Responsiveness in Ten Cases Chapter Three: The Demand for Simultaneous Operations Chapter Four: Responsiveness and Force Size Chapter Five: When Is Responsiveness Needed ? Chapter Six: Enablers, Obstacles, and Risks of Rapid Employment Chapter Seven : Conclusion Appendix A: Case Studies Appendix B: Operations Included in Simultaneity Analysis
Résumé ou extrait
- "The Department of Defense (DoD) argues that it needs to maintain a high level of readiness across the joint force so that it can remain highly responsive. In this report, the author conducts a historical analysis to identify the demand for responsiveness in past U.S. operations. This historical analysis demonstrates that U.S. forces have been called on to rapidly respond to crises many times since 1950 and that responsiveness was important-to varying degrees-to achieving the United States' political aims in all but one of the cases examined. Moreover, the U.S. military has routinely been called on to carry out multiple operations simultaneously. Going forward, the United States must consider the balance between readiness for smaller-scale crisis response operations and being prepared to deter and defeat a great power in major combat. It is not clear that the U.S. military can continue to try to do everything. This historical analysis cannot specify the exact level of readiness that the joint force should maintain. But it does suggest that the United States has demanded a relatively ready military since World War II and that if the American people and American policymakers continue to expect their military to be able to quickly respond to events anywhere in the world, maintaining a relatively high level of readiness will be necessary." (4e de couv.)
Sujet - Nom commun
Lien copié.
Build V.5.2.2 - 2ecb916194 (29/04/2026 07:35:08)