Monographie

Reducing disputes among experts (U) / Kenneth R. Hammond,... ; Harry G. Armstrong Aerospace medical research laboratory...

Type de contenu

Type de médiation

Type de support

Titre(s)

Reducing disputes among experts (U) / Kenneth R. Hammond,... ; Harry G. Armstrong Aerospace medical research laboratory...

Autre(s) responsabilité(s)

Editeur, producteur

Description matérielle

Note(s)

Note sur disponibilité

Note sur les bibliographies et les index

Résumé ou extrait

The aim of this report is to develop a conceptual framework for research leading to the development of an aid for conflict resolution between and among experts. The scientist is taken as a paragon and the use of method-strategies is considered. The general sources of disagreement among experts are alos distinguished. A broad review of the conflict resolution literature is provided and reveals that there are two independent and apparently antithetical approaches (i.e., artificial intelligence-as opposed to-judgement/decision making) regarding conflict among experts. Cognitive Continuum Theory (CCT) is put forward as a general integrative theory that encompasses the complementary features of these two approaches to study expert judgement. CCT is reviewed as a foundation for generating hypotheses regarding: a) the type of dispute to be observed under various task conditions; b) the prediction of characteristics of different disputes, the course of disputes, and certain obstacles of conflict resolution; and c) the efficacy of different forms of conflict resolution aids. Recommendations and criteria are made for developing an aid for reducing conflicts among experts. Keywords: Decision Makings Social Judgement Theory; Intuitive and Analytical Cognition; Expert Systems: Cognitive Continuum Theory; Decision Aids

Sujet - Nom commun

Lien copié.

Build V.5.2.2 - 2ecb916194 (29/04/2026 07:35:08)