Monographie

Hitler's Ostkrieg and the Indian wars : comparing genocide and conquest / Edward B. Westermann

Type de contenu
  • Texte
Type de médiation
  • sans médiation
Type de support
  • Volume
Titre(s)
  • Hitler's Ostkrieg and the Indian wars : comparing genocide and conquest / Edward B. Westermann
Auteur(s)
Publication
  • Norman : University of Oklahoma press
Date de copyright
  • C 2016
Description matérielle
  • 1 vol. (xiii-322 p.) : ill., cartes, jaquette ill. ; 24 cm
Collection
  • Campaigns and commanders vol. 56
ISBN
  • 978-0-8061-5433-6
  • 0-8061-5433-0
EAN
  • 9780806154336 rel.
Appartient à la collection
  • Campaigns and commanders 1556-8652 vol. 56
Classification décimale Dewey
  • 364.151
Note sur les bibliographies et les index
  • Bibliogr. p. 289-309. Index
Résumé ou extrait
  • Extrait de la jaquette : "As he prepared to wage his war of annihilation on the Eastern Front, Adolf Hitler repeatedly drew parallels between the Nazi quest for Lebensraum, or living space, in Eastern Europe and the United States’s westward expansion under the banner of Manifest Destiny. The peoples of Eastern Europe were, he said, his “redskins,” and for his colonial fantasy of a “German East” he claimed a historical precedent in the United States’s displacement and killing of the native population. Edward B. Westermann examines the validity, and value, of this claim in Hitler's Ostkrieg and the Indian Wars.The book takes an empirical approach that highlights areas of similarity and continuity, but also explores key distinctions and differences between these two national projects. The westward march of American empire and the Nazi conquest of the East offer clear parallels, not least that both cases fused a sense of national purpose with racial stereotypes that aided in the exclusion, expropriation, and killing of peoples. Westermann evaluates the philosophies of Manifest Destiny and Lebensraum that justified both conquests, the national and administrative policies that framed Nazi and U.S. governmental involvement in these efforts, the military strategies that supported each nation’s political goals, and the role of massacre and atrocity in both processes. Important differences emerge: a goal of annihilation versus one of assimilation and acculturation; a planned military campaign versus a confused strategy of pacification and punishment; large-scale atrocity as routine versus massacre as exception."
Sujet - Nom commun
Lien copié.
Build V.5.2.2 - 2ecb916194 (29/04/2026 07:35:08)